Reimplantation of cultivated human bone cells from the posterior maxilla for sinus floor augmentation. Histological results from a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Reimplantation of cultivated human bone cells from the posterior maxilla for sinus floor augmentation. Histological results from a randomized controlled clinical trial. / Hermund, N.U.; Stavropoulos, Andreas; Donatsky, O; Nielsen, H.; Clausen, C; Reibel, Jesper; Pakkenberg, Bente; Holmstrup, Palle.

In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, Vol. 23, No. 9, 2012, p. 1031-1037.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hermund, NU, Stavropoulos, A, Donatsky, O, Nielsen, H, Clausen, C, Reibel, J, Pakkenberg, B & Holmstrup, P 2012, 'Reimplantation of cultivated human bone cells from the posterior maxilla for sinus floor augmentation. Histological results from a randomized controlled clinical trial.', Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1031-1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02251.x

APA

Hermund, N. U., Stavropoulos, A., Donatsky, O., Nielsen, H., Clausen, C., Reibel, J., Pakkenberg, B., & Holmstrup, P. (2012). Reimplantation of cultivated human bone cells from the posterior maxilla for sinus floor augmentation. Histological results from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(9), 1031-1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02251.x

Vancouver

Hermund NU, Stavropoulos A, Donatsky O, Nielsen H, Clausen C, Reibel J et al. Reimplantation of cultivated human bone cells from the posterior maxilla for sinus floor augmentation. Histological results from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2012;23(9):1031-1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02251.x

Author

Hermund, N.U. ; Stavropoulos, Andreas ; Donatsky, O ; Nielsen, H. ; Clausen, C ; Reibel, Jesper ; Pakkenberg, Bente ; Holmstrup, Palle. / Reimplantation of cultivated human bone cells from the posterior maxilla for sinus floor augmentation. Histological results from a randomized controlled clinical trial. In: Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2012 ; Vol. 23, No. 9. pp. 1031-1037.

Bibtex

@article{4525f973c7934069a8e1a14c5cf173b1,
title = "Reimplantation of cultivated human bone cells from the posterior maxilla for sinus floor augmentation. Histological results from a randomized controlled clinical trial.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present randomized clinical study was to evaluate histologically whether the addition of cultivated, autogenous bone cells to a composite graft of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and autogenous bone (AB) for sinus floor augmentation (SFA) enhance bone formation compared with what achieved after SFA with DBBM + AB alone.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients with remaining posterior maxillary alveolar crest height of less than 3 mm received SFA after randomization either with an DBBM and AB composite in a 1 : 1 ratio or with DBBM + AB supplemented with autogenous bone cells, which were cultivated from a bone biopsy harvested earlier from the tuberosity area. Four months after SFA, two cylindrical biopsies were taken from the augmented sinuses concomitantly with the implant site preparation by means of a trephine bur. An additional biopsy was taken from the tuberosity area. Bone density at the augmented sinus and the tuberosity area and the height of augmentation were estimated on non-decalcified histological sections prepared from the biopsies. A relative bone density index (RBD) was also calculated by dividing bone density at the augmented sinus with bone density at the tuberosity area.RESULTS: All patients but one could receive two implants after SFA; in one patient, only one implant could be placed. All implants were osseointegrated and could be loaded. Median bone density in the sinus was 30% and 25% in the cell seeded and no-cells added DBBM + AB groups, respectively. Bone augmentation height averaged 6.0 and 5.4 mm and RBD averaged 0.48 and 0.73 in the cell seeded and no-cells added DBBM + AB groups, respectively. None of the differences between groups was statistically significant.CONCLUSIONS: Cultivated autogenous bone cell seeded to a DBBM + AB composite did not significantly improve bone formation (density and height) after SFA, compared with what was achieved with DBBM + AB alone. Both approaches resulted into enough bone to support implant placement and osseointegration.",
author = "N.U. Hermund and Andreas Stavropoulos and O Donatsky and H. Nielsen and C Clausen and Jesper Reibel and Bente Pakkenberg and Palle Holmstrup",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02251.x",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1031--1037",
journal = "Clinical Oral Implants Research",
issn = "0905-7161",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reimplantation of cultivated human bone cells from the posterior maxilla for sinus floor augmentation. Histological results from a randomized controlled clinical trial.

AU - Hermund, N.U.

AU - Stavropoulos, Andreas

AU - Donatsky, O

AU - Nielsen, H.

AU - Clausen, C

AU - Reibel, Jesper

AU - Pakkenberg, Bente

AU - Holmstrup, Palle

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present randomized clinical study was to evaluate histologically whether the addition of cultivated, autogenous bone cells to a composite graft of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and autogenous bone (AB) for sinus floor augmentation (SFA) enhance bone formation compared with what achieved after SFA with DBBM + AB alone.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients with remaining posterior maxillary alveolar crest height of less than 3 mm received SFA after randomization either with an DBBM and AB composite in a 1 : 1 ratio or with DBBM + AB supplemented with autogenous bone cells, which were cultivated from a bone biopsy harvested earlier from the tuberosity area. Four months after SFA, two cylindrical biopsies were taken from the augmented sinuses concomitantly with the implant site preparation by means of a trephine bur. An additional biopsy was taken from the tuberosity area. Bone density at the augmented sinus and the tuberosity area and the height of augmentation were estimated on non-decalcified histological sections prepared from the biopsies. A relative bone density index (RBD) was also calculated by dividing bone density at the augmented sinus with bone density at the tuberosity area.RESULTS: All patients but one could receive two implants after SFA; in one patient, only one implant could be placed. All implants were osseointegrated and could be loaded. Median bone density in the sinus was 30% and 25% in the cell seeded and no-cells added DBBM + AB groups, respectively. Bone augmentation height averaged 6.0 and 5.4 mm and RBD averaged 0.48 and 0.73 in the cell seeded and no-cells added DBBM + AB groups, respectively. None of the differences between groups was statistically significant.CONCLUSIONS: Cultivated autogenous bone cell seeded to a DBBM + AB composite did not significantly improve bone formation (density and height) after SFA, compared with what was achieved with DBBM + AB alone. Both approaches resulted into enough bone to support implant placement and osseointegration.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present randomized clinical study was to evaluate histologically whether the addition of cultivated, autogenous bone cells to a composite graft of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and autogenous bone (AB) for sinus floor augmentation (SFA) enhance bone formation compared with what achieved after SFA with DBBM + AB alone.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients with remaining posterior maxillary alveolar crest height of less than 3 mm received SFA after randomization either with an DBBM and AB composite in a 1 : 1 ratio or with DBBM + AB supplemented with autogenous bone cells, which were cultivated from a bone biopsy harvested earlier from the tuberosity area. Four months after SFA, two cylindrical biopsies were taken from the augmented sinuses concomitantly with the implant site preparation by means of a trephine bur. An additional biopsy was taken from the tuberosity area. Bone density at the augmented sinus and the tuberosity area and the height of augmentation were estimated on non-decalcified histological sections prepared from the biopsies. A relative bone density index (RBD) was also calculated by dividing bone density at the augmented sinus with bone density at the tuberosity area.RESULTS: All patients but one could receive two implants after SFA; in one patient, only one implant could be placed. All implants were osseointegrated and could be loaded. Median bone density in the sinus was 30% and 25% in the cell seeded and no-cells added DBBM + AB groups, respectively. Bone augmentation height averaged 6.0 and 5.4 mm and RBD averaged 0.48 and 0.73 in the cell seeded and no-cells added DBBM + AB groups, respectively. None of the differences between groups was statistically significant.CONCLUSIONS: Cultivated autogenous bone cell seeded to a DBBM + AB composite did not significantly improve bone formation (density and height) after SFA, compared with what was achieved with DBBM + AB alone. Both approaches resulted into enough bone to support implant placement and osseointegration.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02251.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02251.x

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 22092973

VL - 23

SP - 1031

EP - 1037

JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research

JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research

SN - 0905-7161

IS - 9

ER -

ID: 36077971