Salivary a-amylase protects enamel surface against acid induced softening

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference abstract for conferenceResearch

  • Maja Bruvo Lazovic
  • Dennis Moe
  • Kirkeby, Svend
  • Henrik Vorum
  • Allan Bardow Jensen
Objectives: Recently we have demonstrated individual differences in protection against acid-induced enamel softening offered by experimentally developed saliva pellicles. Although ethnicity seemed to be related to protection level, the saliva proteins responsible for the differences were not identified. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to identify the proteins responsible. Methods: Sour taste stimulated parotid saliva was collected from 20 subjects (23±1 years) comprising ten Scandinavians (Sc) and ten non-Scandinavians (NSc) including two Arabs, two Persians, four Pakistanis, one Indian, and one Chinese. After collection, saliva was dialysed and lyophilised and re-dissolved at 0.5% in Type I water. Next, four polished bovine enamel specimens were immersed into each sample under gentle and constant shaking for 12 hours. Last, specimens were exposed to an erosive challenge of pH 2.3 for 4 min along with measurements of surface microhardness (SMH). Changes in SMH from before to after exposure were used to calculate the protective effect of each saliva sample. Quantification and identification of salivary proteins was performed by dual wavelength HPLC at various conditions and MALDI-TOF mass fingerprinting following trypsin digestion. Each persistent peak in the HPLC chromatograms was related to the protective effect against acid-induced enamel softening obtained by the corresponding saliva sample by multiple regression analysis. Results: One peak identified as a-amylase had an explanatory power of 39% in the analysis with high concentrations being most protective (p<0.001). In addition, a smaller peak retrieved later in the chromatograms also had a strong protective effect. Inclusion of this peak in the analysis increased the explanatory power of amylase on protective effect to 65% (p<0.001). However, due to shortness of sample the second peak was not identified. Conclusion: Protective effects of experimentally developed salivary pellicles can be related to their protein composition, although, not all proteins could be identified in this study.

Original languageEnglish
Publication date18 Mar 2011
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 18 Mar 2011
EventIADR General Session & Exhibition - San Diego, United States
Duration: 16 Mar 201119 Mar 2011

Conference

ConferenceIADR General Session & Exhibition
CountryUnited States
CitySan Diego
Period16/03/201119/03/2011

ID: 33956578