An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. / Pallesen, U.; Dijken van, J.W.V.

In: European Journal of Oral Sciences, Vol. 108, No. 3, 06.2000, p. 239-246.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Pallesen, U & Dijken van, JWV 2000, 'An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system', European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 239-246.

APA

Pallesen, U., & Dijken van, J. W. V. (2000). An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 108(3), 239-246.

Vancouver

Pallesen U, Dijken van JWV. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2000 Jun;108(3):239-246.

Author

Pallesen, U. ; Dijken van, J.W.V. / An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. In: European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2000 ; Vol. 108, No. 3. pp. 239-246.

Bibtex

@article{32d2d24074c811dbbee902004c4f4f50,
title = "An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate Cerec CAD/CAM inlays processed of two industrially made machinable ceramics during an 8-yr follow-up period. Each of 16 patients received two similar ceramic inlays. Half the number of the inlays were made of a feldspathic (Vita Mark II) and the other of a glass ceramic (Dicor MGC) block. The inlays were luted with a dual resin composite and evaluated clinically using modified USPHS criteria at baseline, 8 months, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 8 yr, and indirectly using models. At baseline, 84% of the inlays were estimated as optimal and 16% as acceptable. Postoperative sensitivity was reported by one patient for 8 months. Of the 32 inlays evaluated during the 8 yr, 3 failed due to fracture of the material. No secondary caries was found adjacent to the inlays. No significant differences in the clinical performance were found between inlays made of the two ceramics. It can be concluded that the CAD/CAM inlays processed of the two ceramics functioned well during the 8-yr follow-up period.",
keywords = "Adult, Analysis of Variance, Ceramics, Computer-Aided Design, Dental Porcelain, Dental Prosthesis Design, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hot Temperature, Humans, Inlays, Male, Middle Aged, Resin Cements, Treatment Outcome",
author = "U. Pallesen and {Dijken van}, J.W.V.",
year = "2000",
month = jun,
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "239--246",
journal = "European Journal of Oral Sciences",
issn = "0909-8836",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system

AU - Pallesen, U.

AU - Dijken van, J.W.V.

PY - 2000/6

Y1 - 2000/6

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate Cerec CAD/CAM inlays processed of two industrially made machinable ceramics during an 8-yr follow-up period. Each of 16 patients received two similar ceramic inlays. Half the number of the inlays were made of a feldspathic (Vita Mark II) and the other of a glass ceramic (Dicor MGC) block. The inlays were luted with a dual resin composite and evaluated clinically using modified USPHS criteria at baseline, 8 months, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 8 yr, and indirectly using models. At baseline, 84% of the inlays were estimated as optimal and 16% as acceptable. Postoperative sensitivity was reported by one patient for 8 months. Of the 32 inlays evaluated during the 8 yr, 3 failed due to fracture of the material. No secondary caries was found adjacent to the inlays. No significant differences in the clinical performance were found between inlays made of the two ceramics. It can be concluded that the CAD/CAM inlays processed of the two ceramics functioned well during the 8-yr follow-up period.

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate Cerec CAD/CAM inlays processed of two industrially made machinable ceramics during an 8-yr follow-up period. Each of 16 patients received two similar ceramic inlays. Half the number of the inlays were made of a feldspathic (Vita Mark II) and the other of a glass ceramic (Dicor MGC) block. The inlays were luted with a dual resin composite and evaluated clinically using modified USPHS criteria at baseline, 8 months, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 8 yr, and indirectly using models. At baseline, 84% of the inlays were estimated as optimal and 16% as acceptable. Postoperative sensitivity was reported by one patient for 8 months. Of the 32 inlays evaluated during the 8 yr, 3 failed due to fracture of the material. No secondary caries was found adjacent to the inlays. No significant differences in the clinical performance were found between inlays made of the two ceramics. It can be concluded that the CAD/CAM inlays processed of the two ceramics functioned well during the 8-yr follow-up period.

KW - Adult

KW - Analysis of Variance

KW - Ceramics

KW - Computer-Aided Design

KW - Dental Porcelain

KW - Dental Prosthesis Design

KW - Female

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - Hot Temperature

KW - Humans

KW - Inlays

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Resin Cements

KW - Treatment Outcome

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 10872995

VL - 108

SP - 239

EP - 246

JO - European Journal of Oral Sciences

JF - European Journal of Oral Sciences

SN - 0909-8836

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 179896