KNOWLEDGE GAPS IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY: A SYSTEMATIC MAPPING

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

KNOWLEDGE GAPS IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY : A SYSTEMATIC MAPPING. / Österberg, Marie; Holmlund, Anders; Sunzel, Bo; Tranaeus, Sofia; Twetman, Svante; Lund, Bodil.

In: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.2017, p. 93-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Österberg, M, Holmlund, A, Sunzel, B, Tranaeus, S, Twetman, S & Lund, B 2017, 'KNOWLEDGE GAPS IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY: A SYSTEMATIC MAPPING', International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646231700023X

APA

Österberg, M., Holmlund, A., Sunzel, B., Tranaeus, S., Twetman, S., & Lund, B. (2017). KNOWLEDGE GAPS IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY: A SYSTEMATIC MAPPING. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 33(1), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646231700023X

Vancouver

Österberg M, Holmlund A, Sunzel B, Tranaeus S, Twetman S, Lund B. KNOWLEDGE GAPS IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY: A SYSTEMATIC MAPPING. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(1):93-102. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646231700023X

Author

Österberg, Marie ; Holmlund, Anders ; Sunzel, Bo ; Tranaeus, Sofia ; Twetman, Svante ; Lund, Bodil. / KNOWLEDGE GAPS IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY : A SYSTEMATIC MAPPING. In: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2017 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 93-102.

Bibtex

@article{8af13eb0e4004beba62ea5e40f574c27,
title = "KNOWLEDGE GAPS IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY: A SYSTEMATIC MAPPING",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate available knowledge and identify knowledge gaps within the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, by systematically collecting and evaluating systematic reviews. Twelve specific domains were selected: surgical removal of teeth, antibiotic and corticosteroid prophylaxis, orofacial infections, dental and facial trauma, orthognathic surgery, reconstructive surgery, benign tumors, cysts, premalignant lesions, oral complications of treatment of malignant tumors, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, temporomandibular joint surgery, cost effectiveness of different surgical treatments, and ethics.METHODS: The literature search, covering four databases, was conducted during September 2014: PubMed, The Cochrane library, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and EBSCO dentistry and oral science source. Retrieved systematic reviews were quality assessed by AMSTAR.RESULTS: In all, 1,778 abstracts were identified, of which 200 met the inclusion criteria. Forty-five systematic reviews were assessed as of high to moderate quality. The results disclosed some existing evidence in a few domains, such as surgical removal of teeth and implant survival after sinus lifts. However, in all domains, the search revealed a large number of knowledge gaps. Also of concern was the lack of data regarding health economics and ethics.CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, there is a need for well-conducted clinical research in the fields of oral and maxillofacial surgery.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Marie {\"O}sterberg and Anders Holmlund and Bo Sunzel and Sofia Tranaeus and Svante Twetman and Bodil Lund",
year = "2017",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1017/S026646231700023X",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "93--102",
journal = "International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care",
issn = "0266-4623",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - KNOWLEDGE GAPS IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY

T2 - A SYSTEMATIC MAPPING

AU - Österberg, Marie

AU - Holmlund, Anders

AU - Sunzel, Bo

AU - Tranaeus, Sofia

AU - Twetman, Svante

AU - Lund, Bodil

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate available knowledge and identify knowledge gaps within the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, by systematically collecting and evaluating systematic reviews. Twelve specific domains were selected: surgical removal of teeth, antibiotic and corticosteroid prophylaxis, orofacial infections, dental and facial trauma, orthognathic surgery, reconstructive surgery, benign tumors, cysts, premalignant lesions, oral complications of treatment of malignant tumors, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, temporomandibular joint surgery, cost effectiveness of different surgical treatments, and ethics.METHODS: The literature search, covering four databases, was conducted during September 2014: PubMed, The Cochrane library, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and EBSCO dentistry and oral science source. Retrieved systematic reviews were quality assessed by AMSTAR.RESULTS: In all, 1,778 abstracts were identified, of which 200 met the inclusion criteria. Forty-five systematic reviews were assessed as of high to moderate quality. The results disclosed some existing evidence in a few domains, such as surgical removal of teeth and implant survival after sinus lifts. However, in all domains, the search revealed a large number of knowledge gaps. Also of concern was the lack of data regarding health economics and ethics.CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, there is a need for well-conducted clinical research in the fields of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate available knowledge and identify knowledge gaps within the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, by systematically collecting and evaluating systematic reviews. Twelve specific domains were selected: surgical removal of teeth, antibiotic and corticosteroid prophylaxis, orofacial infections, dental and facial trauma, orthognathic surgery, reconstructive surgery, benign tumors, cysts, premalignant lesions, oral complications of treatment of malignant tumors, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, temporomandibular joint surgery, cost effectiveness of different surgical treatments, and ethics.METHODS: The literature search, covering four databases, was conducted during September 2014: PubMed, The Cochrane library, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and EBSCO dentistry and oral science source. Retrieved systematic reviews were quality assessed by AMSTAR.RESULTS: In all, 1,778 abstracts were identified, of which 200 met the inclusion criteria. Forty-five systematic reviews were assessed as of high to moderate quality. The results disclosed some existing evidence in a few domains, such as surgical removal of teeth and implant survival after sinus lifts. However, in all domains, the search revealed a large number of knowledge gaps. Also of concern was the lack of data regarding health economics and ethics.CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, there is a need for well-conducted clinical research in the fields of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1017/S026646231700023X

DO - 10.1017/S026646231700023X

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 28612700

VL - 33

SP - 93

EP - 102

JO - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

JF - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

SN - 0266-4623

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 180816958